Town of Webb Union Free School District is committed to fostering a culture of continuous and essential professional growth which helps to create and environment of academic rigor and student achievement. The new APPR (Annual Professional Performance Review) will be used to foster growth and development, reflection, and refinement of professional practices to further improve the teaching and learning happening within our school.
Principal Effectiveness: Interstate School Leaders Licensure Consortium (ISLLC) Standards
Evaluations of building principals are to be based on multiple measures, aligned with the Educational Leadership Policy Standards (ISLLC 2008). A principal’s performance must be assessed using a principal practice rubric approved by the NYS Education Department. The Town of Webb UFSD is currently using the Multidimensional Principal Performance Rubric.
Any of the Educational Leadership Policy Standards (ISLLC 2008) not addressed in the broad assessment must be assessed at least once a year.
Teacher Effectiveness: NYS Teaching Standards
Evaluations of classroom teachers are to be based on multiple measures, aligned with the NYS Teaching Standards. A teacher’s performance must be assessed using a teacher practice rubric approved by the NYS Education Department. The Town of Webb is currently using the Framework for Teaching 2011 Revised Edition rubric.
In the 2011-2012 school year, the new evaluation system must include teachers of English Language Arts or mathematics in grades 4-8 (including common branch teachers who teach ELA or mathematics). Beginning in the 2012-2013 school year, the evaluation system must include all classroom teachers.
Any of the NYS Teaching Standards not addressed in the broad assessment must be assessed at least once a year.
Teacher/Principal Effectiveness Composite Score
In accordance with NYS Education Law §3012c regarding Annual Professional Performance Reviews (APPR) for teachers, the district will differentiate teacher and principal effectiveness using four rating categories – Highly Effective, Effective, Developing, and Ineffective. Additionally, Education Law §3012-c(2)(a) requires annual professional performance reviews (APPRs) to result in a single composite teacher or principal effectiveness score, which incorporates multiple measures of effectiveness. The final composite score for teacher effectiveness shall be determined as follows:
Categories | Overall Rating | State Assessments | Locally Selected Assessments | Other Measures of Effectiveness |
Highly Effective | 91-100 | 18-20 | 18-20 | 57-60 |
Effective | 75-90 | 9-17 | 9-17 | 50-56 |
Developing | 65-74 | 3-8 | 3-8 | 45-49 |
Ineffective | 0-64 | 0-2 | 0-2 | 0-44 |
The final composite score for the principal effectiveness shall be determined as follows:
Categories | Overall Rating | State Assessments | Locally Selected Assessments | Other Measures of Effectiveness |
Highly Effective | 91-100 | 18-20 | 18-20 | 59-60 |
Effective | 75-90 | 9-17 | 9-17 | 57-58 |
Developing | 65-74 | 3-8 | 3-8 | 55-56 |
Ineffective | 0-64 | 0-2 | 0-2 | 0-56 |
In the event a classroom teacher or principal receives a rating of “Developing” or “Ineffective,” the evaluator and educator will discuss the overall performance rating and begin development of either a Teacher Improvement Plan (TIP) for teachers, according to associated locally negotiated and state approved evaluation plan, or Principal Improvement Plan (PIP) for principals, In the event a classroom teacher or principal receives a rating of “Developing” or “Ineffective,” the evaluator will schedule a meeting to discuss the overall performance rating and begin development of either a Teacher Improvement Plan (TIP) for teachers, or Principal Improvement Plan (PIP) for principals, in accordance with the locally negotiated and New York State approved evaluation plan. Teachers and principals who receive Highly Effective/Effective ratings will receive constructive feedback through a post-conference., and the process outlined in the approved plan.